admb_real:sdreport_and_vpa
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| admb_real:sdreport_and_vpa [2010/09/17 12:09] – lennartfr | admb_real:sdreport_and_vpa [2010/09/20 07:27] (current) – lennartfr | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ===== Comparison of models with VPA ===== | ||
| + | |||
| The purpose of this section is to compare the estimates from our model, with those of the ICES VPA models. | The purpose of this section is to compare the estimates from our model, with those of the ICES VPA models. | ||
| + | :!: The model with the lowest objective function value, and hence the best fit, is the model with [[admb_real: | ||
| ==== VPA trajectories and confidence intervals for the estimated population trajectories ==== | ==== VPA trajectories and confidence intervals for the estimated population trajectories ==== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 16: | ||
| |{{: | |{{: | ||
| - | As can be seen, the cohorts born in 1994 to 1997 seem to be the strongest. Also, the curves are not monotoic, with the curve for the cohort born 1988 having a particularly challenging shape. This should be taken into consideration when designing the model. | + | As can be seen, the cohorts born in 1994 to 1997 seem to be the strongest. Also, the curves are not monotonic, with the curve for the cohort born 1988 having a particularly challenging shape. This should be taken into consideration when designing the model. |
| ==== Simple model ==== | ==== Simple model ==== | ||
admb_real/sdreport_and_vpa.1284725383.txt.gz · Last modified: 2010/09/17 12:09 by lennartfr